Sunday, October 31, 2021

The First Chief

     If you read the history of the Fairfax Police Department on the Village of Fairfax website, you will learn that the department was organized in 1955 and consisted of one officer. That officer isn’t named, perhaps because of his rather tumultuous tenure in the position as first chief of the Fairfax Police Department.

    Lonnie V. Auterson was a 1944 graduate of Hartwell High School, where he was an athlete and, as stated in his high school yearbook, “a frequent victim of Cupid’s arrows.” He enrolled for the draft on his 18th birthday and served as a Navy Seabee in World War II. He was mustered out in 1946 and initially worked as an electrician. He joined the Mariemont Police Department on December 1, 1949.


Lonnie Auterson's Hartwell High School senior picture.  Ancestry.com. U.S. School Yearbooks, 1900-1999 [database online]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010

    According to newspaper accounts, Auterson was a popular officer in Mariemont and children would go out of their way to cross the street with “Lonnie,” as they called him. He even made the front page of the Cincinnati Enquirer in 1951, when he successfully lassoed a wayward mule that had escaped in Madeira and terrorized Mariemont churchgoers before Auterson was able to secure it. 

Cincinnati Enquirer, March 12, 1951

    After finally incorporating as a village and electing a mayor and council members, the Village of Fairfax established a police department. There were 20 applicants for the position of chief and Lonnie Auterson was chosen as the first member of the Fairfax police force and its first chief, starting the job on December 1, 1955. Soon thereafter, two additional officers were hired to staff the department. Chief Auterson’s first couple of years in Fairfax seem to have been relatively uneventful. 


Fairfax Police Chief Lonnie Auterson; Cincinnati Enquirer, April 24,1959

    On May 4, 1958, Lonnie Auterson and his wife Juanita went out to celebrate their fourth wedding anniversary. Auterson later explained, "I had dinner and about four highballs and then went to see some friends. After we left, my wife and I had a violent argument on the way home and I let her out of the car." Around 12:30 a.m. on May 5, Silverton police saw Auterson speeding and weaving on Montgomery Road and attempted to pull him over. He didn’t comply and ran three traffic lights. The pursuit continued onto Stewart Road, heading toward Madisonville. It ended when Auterson’s convertible jumped a curb, became airborne, took out a traffic sign and some small trees, and landed in a ditch.


Cincinnati Times-Star, May 5, 1958

    When Silverton police arrived at the crash scene, Auterson became combative and had to be handcuffed. The officers said they could tell he had been drinking. He was transported to Our Lady of Mercy Hospital in Mariemont with injuries to his face, head, leg, and hand. He received around 70 stitches and was released. Silverton police charged him with reckless driving, failing to obey a police officer’s command, and driving while intoxicated. This was Auterson’s first arrest.

     Juanita Auterson? She was located around and hour and a half after the incident, walking on Stewart Road.

     Fairfax mayor John Dinkel was hesitant to take any disciplinary action against Auterson, saying, "Auterson has been a fine officer and I'm not going to condemn him for one mistake. We'll wait and see what happens at his trial." Mayor Dinkel said that a petition was being circulated in the village to keep Auterson as police chief, but that there were other petitions requesting that he be removed. He said that the chief had been placed on a leave of absence due to his injuries, not because of the charges filed against him. Patrolman Charles Doughton was named acting chief of police.

     Chief Auterson was able to explain his behavior on that night, though the explanations sound a bit unbelievable. He admitted to drinking, but denied being drunk. He said he didn’t realize police were chasing him because the rear window of his convertible was steamed up. He heard the sirens, but didn’t pay attention because he was upset about the argument with his wife. He said the crash occurred because a cigarette became stuck between his lips and burned his fingers. He didn’t recall resisting the officers, but said if he did it was because he was distraught over the disagreement with his wife. 

    On June 21, 1958, Lonnie Auterson pleaded guilty to reckless driving and ignoring a police officer’s command, but requested a jury trial on the driving while intoxicated charge. Sentencing on the first two charges was deferred until there was a verdict on the driving while intoxicated charge. When asked whether the guilty pleas could lead to Chief Auterson’s firing, Mayor Dinkel only said, “Chief Auterson is a good chief.”

     The chief’s leave of absence was extended until after his trial and in the meantime the village council considered what to do about Auterson’s employment status. Three council members voted to terminate Chief Auterson’s employment and three voted against it. One newspaper account stated that Mayor Dinkel refused to vote to break the tie and another said he voted against termination. In any event, Lonnie Auterson wasn’t fired.

     Throughout the spring and summer, Auterson’s trial was postponed at least four times, either due to orders from his physician or difficulty seating a jury in Silverton mayor’s court. In a meeting before 60 Fairfax residents, Mayor Dinkel said he had no intention of firing Auterson, regardless of the outcome of the trial on the DWI charge.

     On August 9, 1958, Lonnie Auterson was found not guilty of DWI in the first jury trial in the history of Silverton mayor’s court. He was fined $50 for each of the two charges to which he had previously pleaded guilty. The Cincinnati Post reported that when the verdict was read, Auterson sat at the defense table with a smile on his face and "then his pretty, dark-haired wife, Juanita, ran to his side and planted a kiss on his cheek."

     When reached for comment after the verdict, Chief Auterson said, "My phone rang with people who wanted to congratulate me all night Saturday and Sunday. I'm going to stay on this job now."

     After the verdict, the Cincinnati Post published an opinion piece critical of Mayor Dinkel and the three council members who voted to retain Auterson as chief. Although the writer acknowledged that Auterson might be a good chief and that he had suffered consequences for the charges against him, he also opined that as a police chief Auterson should be held to a higher standard than a regular citizen.

     So, Lonnie Auterson and the Fairfax Police Department dropped out of the news, at least for a few months.

     On Thursday April 23, 1959 Fairfax officers Robert Schoonover and Charles Doughton said they were exchanging information in the driveway of Chief Auterson’s home on Wooster Pike during a shift change. Auterson pulled up in his personal car and demanded that Schoonover explain what he had done that day. Schoonover said he had been quite busy and asked Auterson what he had done. According to the officers, Auterson spent the next several minutes disparaging the officers’ job performance and then told Doughton to get to work.

     After leaving Auterson’s house, Schoonover and Doughton went to Mayor John Dinkel’s home to report an argument with Auterson during which Doughton was suspended from duty. It isn’t clear from the newspaper articles whether it was the argument that day or an earlier argument. In any event, while at the mayor’s residence, Schoonover reported that he saw Chief Auterson driving the police cruiser in an intoxicated condition. Schoonover filed an affidavit charging Auterson with driving while intoxicated which was also signed by Mayor Dinkel.

     The next day, it appears that the mayor tried to downplay the issue, saying that he had not signed an affidavit. The Cincinnati Enquirer quoted him as saying, “Some wisecrack remark may have been made, but there’s nothing formal been filed. I will check into the matter within the next few days. I have been talking to the chief tonight and he thinks the whole thing is ridiculous.”


Robert Schoonover, Mayor John Dinkel, and Charles Doughton; Cincinnati Enquirer, April 25, 1959

    However, Mayor Dinkel must have changed his mind pretty quickly, because the next day he placed Chief Auterson on an indefinite leave of absence and said he planned to meet informally with council members to discuss whether Auterson should be dismissed. Charles Doughton was again named acting chief. For his part, Lonnie Auterson offered to resign his position effective May 15 if Robert Schoonover agreed to drop the charges. Schoonover refused. 50 residents came to the Fairfax mayor’s court that evening, but were disappointed when Auterson didn’t appear.

     On April 26, the mayor announced that council would soon discuss whether to dismiss Chief Auterson. He said he would present evidence on the charge brought by Schoonover, but would make no recommendation on whether to retain Auterson.

     Juanita Auterson was also speaking out. She denied that her husband was on a leave of absence, but said he was out of town on vacation until May 15. She said that Lonnie hadn’t been drinking on April 23, but had been visiting his sick father at Bethesda Hospital. She said that her husband, at their own insistence, had taken a sobriety test and that the doctor who performed the test thought it was unnecessary. When asked if her husband would be returning to work after his vacation, Mrs. Auterson said, "Not if he listens to me. If he does there may be a new headline in the papers - 'Wife Shoots Chief.'"

     The timing and results of the sobriety test are not documented in any newspaper account.

     On May 5, 1959, Fairfax Village Council accepted the resignation Chief Lonnie Auterson effective May 15. In his letter sent from St. Louis, Auterson wrote that he was resigning with regret, due to the publicity surrounding his case. His resignation was not predicated upon Officer Schoonover dropping the charge. On May 19, Auterson pleaded not guilty at a hearing before a county judge and was bound over to the grand jury.

     Around the same time, Robert Schoonover tendered his resignation effective June 1. Schoonover said that since he filed the charge against Auterson, everyone involved in the case "has only been looking out for himself. I'm a beaten man." Mayor John Dinkel said “I hate to see him go.” Because Schoonover failed to pursue the case against Auterson any further, the charge was eventually dropped.

     The two resignations left the department with only one officer, Charles Doughton. Dinkel recommended making Doughton the chief, but council turned down this proposal. Instead, council opened the position to applicants. 10 candidates took the written test for police chief and council narrowed the list to two applicants. However, neither applicant resided in Ohio and Mayor Dinkel advised council that a police chief must live in the state for at least one year prior to appointment. The mayor and council did appoint a new police officer for the department at the August 18, 1959 council meeting, though.

     Support for Charles Doughton to become permanent police chief was gaining steam around the village. Hundreds of residents signed petitions in support of Doughton. Residents were also becoming concerned about police protection and slow response time, particularly since school would be starting soon. Despite support from the mayor and many residents, council chose not to make Doughton the chief. Charles Doughton resigned from the Fairfax Police Department effective January 1, 1960, saying “Council is trying to run the Police Department which is officially the job of the mayor.”

     Ultimately, 55-year-old retired Cincinnati Police lieutenant James Finan was named as the second chief of the Fairfax Police Department effective January 5, 1960. He served as chief for the next decade, during which he headed the investigations into three of the most difficult cases in our village’s history – the kidnapping and murder of 4-year-old Debbie Dappen, the disappearance of 9-year-olds Johnny Hundley and Jimmy McQueary, and the murder of service station attendant Troy Lee Carr.

     As far as I can tell, both Lonnie Auterson and Robert Schoonover left police work after the 1959 incident. Both men died fairly young, Auterson in 1978 at the age of 51 and Schoonover in 1975 at the age of 45. Charles Doughton was hired as a patrolman for the Mariemont Police Department and left the department as a lieutenant over 20 years later.

Sources

Cincinnati Enquirer, various dates, 3/12/1951 - 12/28/1959; 3/20/1978

Cincinnati Post, various dates, 11/14/1955 - 1/6/1960

Ancestry.com. U.S. School Yearbooks, 1900-1999 [database online]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. 2010

(Detailed sources available upon request.)


Thursday, September 30, 2021

The Missing Boys

 

[NOTE: Those of us who have lived in Fairfax have long heard rumors and speculation about the disappearance of Johnny Hundley and Jimmy McQueary. While I acknowledge the potential shortcomings of news reporting, for this post I have chosen to source primarily contemporaneous newspaper articles about the boys’ disappearance rather than personal reminiscence and speculation.]


                               Johnny Hundley                                         Jimmy McQueary

    Fairfax was a great place to grow up with a lot to explore. My mom and, decades later, my brother liked to play near Little Duck Creek. My friends and I wandered freely through the village, hunting for pop bottles at the car wash and cashing them in at one of our local stores, yelling for the workers at Keebler to toss cookies over the back fence to us, dumpster diving behind the Dragon Way office buildings, walking to Frisch’s to grab a Big Boy comic book. I have heard many people who grew up here liken Fairfax to Mayberry on the Andy Griffith Show.

    But in 1964, Fairfax bore little resemblance to Mayberry. In June, a teenaged Fairfax boy drowned in the Little Miami River and a little over a month later a woman who lived on Simpson drowned in almost the same location. In August, a little girl who lived on Lonsdale was killed by a teenager who lived just a couple of blocks away. And in October two nine-year-old boys disappeared without a trace.

     On Wednesday October 14, 1964, Jimmy McQueary arrived home around 9:00 p.m. with mud on his shoes. Jimmy, his parents James and Matilda, and his siblings lived on Wooster Pike in Fairfax, where the Midas shop currently stands. There was a sewer project on nearby Eleanor Street and Jimmy had been playing around the construction site. Mr. McQueary told Jimmy to come home immediately after school on Thursday and stay in the house. The same day, Mrs. McQueary learned that Jimmy had been at Frisch’s Mainliner restaurant the previous weekend and left without paying his bill of a little over a dollar. She gave Jimmy enough money so he could go and pay the bill.

     Jimmy was a third grader at Fairfax School and, as his father instructed, came home immediately after school on Thursday October 15, 1964, walking home with his older sister. He changed his clothes, then went out to play.

     Johnny Hundley was Jimmy’s third grade classmate and the boys were said to have been inseparable. Johnny lived on Germania Avenue, just a block from the school. Johnny’s dad Robert “Toby” Hundley had died in April 1963 and his mom Gladys worked to support the family. He had a brother and two sisters. His elder sister recalled years later that Johnny came home after school that day, gathered some pop bottles, and walked to the corner store to cash them in.

     Thursday afternoon was pleasant, with fair skies and a temperature in the mid-70s. After leaving school and stopping at home, Jimmy and Johnny got together. The story goes that Johnny went to Jimmy’s house and Jimmy slipped out the back door, despite his dad’s instruction to stay in the house. At 3:45 to 4:00 p.m. that day, the boys were seen at Frisch’s Mainliner by a man who was in the parking lot with a group of friends, and a little later by a waitress. The boys told the man in the parking lot that they had found a $20 bill. The man didn’t see the money and didn’t ask questions about where they found it. The boys showed the waitress the $20 bill. The waitress said the boys had stopped in to pay their outstanding bill from the previous weekend.

     Around the same time, a schoolmate saw Johnny and Jimmy in the lot in front of the Colonial Center Building on Dragon Way. This boy lived near the dead end of Eleanor Street, which could be accessed on foot through the rear parking lot of the Joseph Ferris House next to the Colonial Center Building. The boy later reported that he last saw Johnny and Jimmy walking toward the Strietmann Biscuit Company (subsequently known as Keebler and now as Kellogg’s). One could walk through the rear parking lot of the Colonial Center Building to access a back gate to Strietmann where Spring Street dead ended at Riverview Drive.

     Years later in an interview with WCPO News, Johnny’s elder sister recalled that he wasn’t home when she finished preparing supper at 6:00 p.m. She called her mother at work, who told her to call around to see if she could locate him. She was unable to find him. At 8:00 pm., after returning home from work, Mrs. Hundley called Mrs. McQueary and learned that Jimmy was also missing. Mrs. Hundley called the Fairfax Police and they put a missing persons report on the teletype at 8:25 p.m. Johnny’s sister later recalled that police thought the boys had run away. However, both families disagreed, stating that neither boy had reason to run away. Johnny’s family said he was very conscientious about being home on time. A friend told police that one of the boys had asked him to run away several times.

     Below is a map (using 2017 satellite imagery) showing locations relevant to the boys’ disappearance:


    In the hours and days that followed, there were a number of reported sightings of the boys throughout the greater Cincinnati area. Among the sightings:

  • A woman reported seeing the boys at 5:30 p.m. on the day of the disappearance as she was waiting in front of the Strietmann offices. Upon further questioning by police, the woman was unable to identify the boys as Johnny and Jimmy.
  • A teenaged Fairfax girl reported seeing Johnny talking with a group of kids at 6:30 p.m. on Germania Avenue on the day of the disappearance. She didn’t know Jimmy, so she couldn’t say if he was also there.
  • A B & O Railroad train inspector told Fairfax Police that he saw two boys playing in the Bond Hill train yard on Friday morning October 16. He identified one boy, with whom he spoke, as Jimmy McQueary. He said the other boy stayed in the background.
  • A woman called the Hundley home and reported that on Saturday October 17 she and three other hunters encountered two boys coming out of the woods near the Beechmont Levee. They asked the boys how the hunting was there and they answered that they didn’t know because they didn’t live around there.
  • On Saturday evening October 17, three people reported two little boys playing outside of Lunken Airport and cleaning up in a restroom.

    Apparently, none of these sightings was confirmed and searches found no sign of Johnny and Jimmy. Unfortunately, some of these reports were made to police hours or even days after the supposed sightings.

     Meanwhile, Fairfax Police Chief James Finan reported that police had searched all the likely spots the boys might be and found nothing. He expressed doubt that the boys were still in Fairfax and said that a community-wide search wasn’t planned. The Cincinnati Enquirer reported that on Saturday October 17 only one auxiliary police officer and Mr. James McQueary were searching for the boys, looking along the Little Miami River. When asked about Chief Finan’s whereabouts, the officer on duty at the police station said he didn’t know and “He’s off on Saturday and Sunday.” The officer on duty also repeated the story that one of the boys had been talking about running away.

     Perhaps the police changed their minds about a search, because on Sunday October 18, 35 volunteers joined police for a search around the Little Miami River.

     Tips and sightings continued to be reported to police, but none led to useful information. Authorities were concerned that the boys may have hopped on a railroad boxcar and left town. Boxcars were searched both locally and hundreds of miles away. Police searched vacant buildings and warehouses. A Cincinnati Police helicopter performed an aerial search of Fairfax. Bulletins about the boys’ disappearance were distributed to hundreds of police agencies around the country.

     On Tuesday October 20, attention was turned to the sewer trench work that was being done on Eleanor Street when the boys disappeared. Because the boys had played in the area, there was speculation that they might have been buried in the trench. A load of gravel had been dumped in the trench after Johnny and Jimmy disappeared. Part of the trench was re-excavated, but crews found no trace of the boys.

    The following day, Fairfax Police picked up Johnny’s and Jimmy’s textbooks from Fairfax School and sent them to the FBI to obtain fingerprints. While at the school, the police officer spoke to around 30 children to try to get clues to the boys’ disappearance.

     On Thursday October 22, police searched the area near Columbia Parkway and Red Bank Road. On Saturday October 24, Fairfax Police and two Kentucky river patrolmen searched the Little Miami River from Mariemont to Fairfax. Chief Finan expressed confidence that the boys weren’t in the river, but still thought there was a possibility that they had hopped on a railroad box car and would be found in another part of the country.

     On Tuesday October 27, Chief Finan met with representatives of 13 local police departments to review the case and solicit ideas. The railyard and boxcar searches were unsuccessful. On November 11, Jimmy’s parents took and passed a polygraph test.  

    About a month after Johnny and Jimmy disappeared, there was a sighting with a supposedly positive identification of the boys. A truck driver from Batavia, Ohio, who knew about the missing Fairfax boys, stopped into a service station in Lily, Kentucky. The employees there told him about two boys who came into the station to get out of the rain and asked if they could spend the night there. The attendants allowed them to stay because the station was open 24 hours. The boys said they were from Fairfax, Ohio and had left home. They said they were on their way to Strietmann Biscuit Company and told how they got cookies from the carloading area. The boys left the next morning, catching a ride to London, Kentucky with a trucker. The employees identified the boys from photographs provided by police.

     A hopeful Gladys Hundley went to Lily, Kentucky to try to get more information. Sadly, it was all for naught. The parents of the boys who spent the night at the service station contacted police. These boys were teenagers from Loveland, Ohio who left home on November 13 and had since returned. Chief Finan interviewed the boys and was satisfied that they were the ones who spent the night in the service station.

     In early January 1965, Gladys Hundley tearfully described to a Cincinnati Enquirer reporter her painful holiday season. She said she thought about buying Christmas gifts for Johnny, but that doing this would make life all the more difficult for her family if Johnny were to be found dead. She said that prayer was all she had left and that she was under a doctor’s care for nervousness. Mrs. Hundley said that January 13 would be Johnny’s 10th birthday.

     In February 1965, attention again turned to the sewer trench project on Eleanor Street. Village residents and new Hamilton County coroner Dr. Frank Cleveland were concerned that not enough of the sewer trench had been dug up in October. In March, more of the trench was re-excavated. The digging, some of it done by hand, took four days and nothing was found. One of the workers involved in the re-excavation said he was working on the trench on the day the boys went missing and there had been no sign of a cave-in. 

                                     Source: Cincinnati Enquirer, March 24, 1965 and March 25, 1965

    Mrs. McQueary hoped that the digging would be extended to include a hillside by a culvert that ran east from Spring Street to behind her home on Wooster Pike. In addition, Fairfax councilman John Pfister suggested that the boys could have been buried in dirt fill near his home on Spring Street. He said that dirt from the sewer project was being dumped there the day of the disappearance and that the boys frequently played there. However, after the second sewer trench re-excavation, no further digging was done in this area.

     In 1967, there appeared to be a break in the case. On September 14, a 17-year-old Fairfax boy who had recently enlisted in the Marine Corps and was serving in San Diego, told a minister there that he had killed Johnny and Jimmy due to a feud he had with the older brother of one of the boys. He said he had a friend with him at the time. The boy said he lured Johnny and Jimmy into the woods by promising them beer. Once in the woods, he said he stabbed one child and the other ran away. The accomplice caught the second child and then the boy stabbed him also.

     After speaking to the boy for two hours, the minister called the police at the boy’s request. The boy waived extradition and Chief Finan and a Hamilton County coroner’s office investigator flew to San Diego, took him into custody, and returned to Cincinnati.

     There were immediately doubts about the young Marine’s confession. The minister hinted in a newspaper interview that the confession might be untrue and that the boy was homesick. He also said that the boy claimed to have killed the boys “last October,” not in 1964. His parents explained that a friend with whom their son enlisted had been dismissed from the Marines a week earlier due to an eye condition. Their son was also not meeting expectations as a Marine. The boy’s father said that his son didn’t exhibit any unusual behavior after Johnny’s and Jimmy’s disappearance and didn’t hang around at the time with the boy he named as an accomplice. His parents believed he was looking for a way to leave the Marine Corps.

     The boy told investigators that he buried Johnny and Jimmy in the woods where he killed them and buried the knife in his backyard. The Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation was called in to help in the search of the boy’s yard. A search with a metal detector only yielded some unrelated items. Sections of the backyard were dug up and the knife wasn’t located.

     On September 16, 1967, Chief Finan and the Marine returned to Fairfax. The boy led police to at least six different locations where he said he buried the children. Years later, Johnny’s elder sister recalled that her mother Gladys followed along with the search and said how devastated she was when nothing was found. That day, the young Marine retracted his confession, but the search for the weapon and the boys’ bodies continued. On September 18, Chief Finan called on the boy to take a polygraph, but he and his parents declined on the advice of their attorney.

     On September 19, 1967, the alleged accomplice, who had since moved to Indianapolis, passed a polygraph test. That day, the Marine’s attorney agreed to let him take a polygraph to relieve some of the harassment he said the boy’s family was experiencing and because he felt that Fairfax Police were still casting suspicion on him. He took a polygraph on September 21 and passed. Chief Finan accepted the results and felt they exonerated the boy. Years later, Chief Finan said Fairfax Police never found any evidence to link the boy to the disappearance of Johnny and Jimmy.

     Through the years, police occasionally received tips about the boys’ disappearance, but none appeared to be useful. In recent years, police even pursued a lead to Foxborough, Massachusetts where a woman alleged that her father, who was originally from the greater Cincinnati area, had abducted the boys, killed them in his basement, and buried them under the porch. There was an unproductive search of the property with cadaver dogs. Police interviewed the man, other family members, and the woman who made the report (who was being treated for unspecified mental health issues) and determined the story was untrue.

     Johnny Hundley and Jimmy McQueary have become part of Fairfax folklore, kind of like our own Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn. Local news broadcasts feature the story every few years to increase ratings for sweeps season. Social media loves stories like this and people who have no connection to the boys or the community offer uninformed and unfair opinions and theories. We must never forget, though, that the boys are not fictional characters.

     I recall an interview with John Kennedy, Jr. around the time the film “JFK” was released. The interviewer asked whether he would see the movie and Kennedy responded that he wouldn’t “because that’s not entertainment to me.” Johnny and Jimmy’s story isn’t entertainment for those who loved them. Their parents have passed away without knowing what happened to them. Their disappearance still hurts for those who were left behind. It is my sincere hope that the boys’ surviving family and friends find peace.

This is still an open case and there is a Violent Criminal Apprehension Program alert on the FBI website, which can be accessed at https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/vicap/missing-persons/hundley_je_mcquery_ja.pdf/view.


Sources

(Detailed sources available upon request)

Cincinnati Enquirer, various dates, October 17, 1964 to September 20, 1967

Cincinnati Post, various dates, October 17, 1964 to January 10, 1978

WCPO.com, June 15, 2017, I-Team Unsolved: What happened to Johnny Hundley and Jimmy McQueary?


Tuesday, August 31, 2021

The George and Dragon

     As I wrapped up my previous post on the Joseph Ferris House, I mentioned that since the building ceased to be a residence that it had been occupied by various businesses. In the 1960s, the house was home to a series of restaurants and lounges.

     In 1962, the Ferris House and surrounding acreage were purchased by Columbia-Wooster Building, Inc., owned by the Hoxby family, commercial real estate investors. Hoxby Enterprises, Inc. was headed by British-born Harry J. Hoxby. The Columbia-Wooster complex with its bank and office buildings was inspired by the colonial architecture of the Ferris House. The Ferris House was converted to a restaurant and lounge. The first liquor license at the location was issued to the Columbia Lounge in July 1963.

     Later in 1963, the Hoxbys announced the upcoming opening of The George and Dragon, a 250-seat fine dining restaurant. A large statue of St. George slaying a dragon was constructed outside of the restaurant.

     In case you aren’t familiar with the tale of St. George and the Dragon, here is the story in a nutshell. A town was terrorized by a dragon that required sacrifices. Initially, livestock was sacrificed, but as the supply ran out, human sacrifices began. In time, the king’s daughter was selected for sacrifice. George, hearing the plight of the unfortunate princess, travelled from afar to come to her rescue. When he arrived in town, he found a dragon covered by heavy scales that his trusty sword couldn’t penetrate. He slayed the dragon by plunging the sword under its wing, where there were no scales. Because of his valiant actions, St. George is the patron saint of England and several other countries, cities, and groups. Perhaps Harry Hoxby’s British background inspired the restaurant’s theme.

     The George and Dragon opened in September 1964, serving French and European cuisine. The executive chef had previously worked at the Four Seasons in New York and had a staff of French chefs. The general manager had been employed by Delmonico’s in New York. Pretty high-class personnel for a restaurant in humble little Fairfax! The George and Dragon was initially in high demand. According to an October 9, 1964 Cincinnati Post article, “Three thousand sent in requests for credit cards and most of them tried to show up on opening night a month ago.” The George and Dragon also had a cocktail lounge, the Dragon’s Den, with live entertainment.

     After three months, the initial concept didn’t seem to be working. The management said there was a language barrier with the English-speaking servers unable to read the French menus and the French chefs not understanding the servers’ English. They also said the kitchen was too small to prepare French cuisine. The general manager and executive chef and his staff were dismissed, replaced by personnel with experience at other establishments in the Cincinnati area. The menu changed from European cuisine to American favorites.

     The revamped George and Dragon also reduced the number of menu offerings, cut prices on lunch items, and expanded lunch service to the restaurant instead of only serving lunch in the Dragon’s Den. In January 1965, they had a month of Monday ladies’ nights when women dining with an escort could get a free meal. Dancing in the Dragon’s Den was expanded to weekdays and the restaurant began offering dancing on Saturday nights.

     By September 1965, the George and Dragon and Dragon’s Den had ceased operation. The building was in foreclosure and was purchased at a sheriff’s auction for two-thirds of the appraisal value by Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company. In early 1966, Imperial Foods signed a long-term lease to operate the restaurant and lounge. Imperial maintained the name, décor, and statue, but served American cuisine with some European specialties at a much lower price point. The restaurant reopened in April 1966 without a liquor license for the first six weeks, but the Cincinnati Enquirer reported on June 3, 1966 that the restaurant was “getting a good reception in spite of it.” The restaurant added a Friday seafood buffet, which became fairly popular. These ads for the reimagined George and Dragon are from the Cincinnati Catholic Telegraph:


Despite the efforts of the new ownership, the George and Dragon restaurant dropped meal service in April 1968, concentrating their efforts on the Dragon’s Den. The former restaurant space was used for private parties. According to an April 26, 1968 Cincinnati Post article, the Dragon’s Den would be managed by the former manager of the Playboy Club and Little Foxes Top of the Inn (sort of a Playboy Club knockoff), who promised “new entertainment, an across-the-board price, limited dinner menu and pretty, young waitresses in abbreviated French maid outfits.” I have a feeling they stopped advertising in the Cincinnati Catholic Telegraph about this time.

     In August 1968, Imperial Foods turned over the establishment to Hospitality Management Services, Inc., a subsidiary company with a sense of humor, it seems. The name of the restaurant was changed from the dignified George and Dragon to the campy Guy on a Horse. Remember the St. George and the Dragon statue? The publicist for Hospitality Management explained that the previous owners “left behind a horrendous 15-foot statue of a knight on horseback. Goodwill wouldn’t take it and dynamite wouldn’t budge it. This mistake out of the past still stands at the side of our new restaurant and being eternal optimists, we have endeavored to somehow make use of it.”

     An executive of Hospitality Management explained that they wanted to serve interesting food, while removing the stuffiness from the establishment. A November 1, 1968 Cincinnati Post article described the menu as follows:

The menu [contains] a series of asides that range from appetizers (“order one, you’ll need it”) to desserts (“may we suggest bicarbonate of soda, served in the lobby”).

The soup listing carries the admonition “no slurping in the dining room, please”; salads are described as “frequently better than the entrée” and the cold buffet as “leftovers.”

Guests are urged to have a before-dinner cocktail because “the profit’s in the liquor, not the food,” and to visit the wine cellar but “no pinching our wenches, please.”

Even the prices from $4 to $6 for entrée, vegetable, potato, salad and beverage are kidded – “you can buy better, but you can’t pay more.”

     Despite their attempts to remove stuffiness from the fine dining experience, Guy on a Horse fared no better than its predecessor and closed in June 1969.

     Next up for the old Joseph Ferris House was the Italian Den, intended to be the first of a national chain of mid-price restaurants to bridge the gap between high-priced fine dining establishments and fast food joints. One of the first orders of business was to get rid of the St. George and the Dragon statue, the demise of which was documented in the September 5, 1969 Cincinnati Post. A sad day, to be sure.


     
By November 1969, the Italian Den was under new ownership. The new owners temporarily suspended service in the restaurant to redecorate and make it look more Italian. (I wonder if they added red and white check tablecloths and candles in old Chianti bottles.) They continued to operate the lounge as a nightspot until the restaurant was ready.

     By July 1970, the restaurant and lounge business in the Ferris House was finished. Italian Den was gone and the building was occupied by Structural Dynamics Research Corporation. The corporation used the kitchen as their computer room and the dining room for seminars.

     I was quite young while these restaurants were in operation and have no recollection of them. I don’t even remember the St. George and the Dragon statue. I have to say that this story was a headscratcher for me. Let’s face it, Fairfax is known for primarily for fast food and the iconic Frisch’s Mainliner. Fine dining doesn’t seem like a good fit and, as it turned out, it wasn’t.  I wouldn’t mind a nice mid-priced restaurant, though (a statue is optional).

Sources

Cincinnati Catholic Telegraph, various dates, September 30, 1966 to November 11, 1966

The Cincinnati Enquirer, June 3, 1966

The Cincinnati Post, various dates, July 29, 1963 to July 17, 1970

 (Detailed sources available upon request.)

Saturday, July 31, 2021

The Joseph Ferris House

 

Joseph Ferris House

    For most of my life, I have known that this is the oldest existing structure in the village of Fairfax. An elderly friend who grew up in Fairfax recently told me that it was a stop on the Underground Railroad. I suppose this could be true, but hasn’t, to the best of my knowledge, been authenticated. My mom, sister, and I heard that this building once housed a school, but can’t remember who might have told us. In case you were under a similar incorrect impression, here is the true story.

     So, let’s get the dry historical stuff out of the way first. In the late 1780s, a New Jersey judge and congressman named John Cleves Symmes and his associates formed a company to purchase land in the Northwest Territory between the Great Miami and Little Miami Rivers. This became known as the Symmes or Miami Purchase.

     In 1799, brothers Eliphalet (age 25), Joseph (23), and Andrew (20) Ferris of Greenwich, Connecticut purchased 480 acres in Fractional Range 2, Township 4, Section 15 of the Symmes Purchase. This area includes much of modern-day Fairfax and Mariemont and is pictured in the maps below:






    The Ferris brothers were farmers and millers. At first, they worked in partnership. Later, however, they divided their property and Andrew took his share in cash. Andrew purchased land and built his home on Madison Road in the western section of what would become Madisonville.

     Eldest brother Eliphalet and his family built their brick house in 1802 on what is now Plainville Road in Mariemont. Although the Betts House in Cincinnati’s West End, built in 1804, claims to be Ohio’s oldest brick home, the Eliphalet Ferris house may be older. A check of the Hamilton County Auditor’s website shows that the Eliphalet Ferris house was built two years prior to the Betts House.

Eliphalet Ferris House

    Joseph Ferris initially constructed and lived in a log house. In addition to farming and milling, Joseph pursued distilling, possibly the reason he was able to build a larger house than his brother Eliphalet. As of 1898, the house still contained bottles of brandy that Joseph distilled back in the 1820s. Joseph’s estate ultimately included 700 acres.

     Joseph began construction of his brick home in 1807 at what is now the intersection of Dragon Way and Wooster Pike in Fairfax. The bricks were hauled by barge up the Little Miami River. The house was first occupied in 1808 with additions made in subsequent years. On August 25, 1811, Joseph married Priscilla Knapp, also of Greenwich, Connecticut. Joseph and Priscilla had eight children. He established a school for his and other neighboring children near the current location of Harvard Acres in Mariemont. Only two of their children, Mary and Sarah, ever wed, marrying brothers John Brooks Jewett and Eri Leonard Jewett. The remaining Ferris children continued to live in the family residence.

    Joseph Ferris died in 1831. Priscilla was a 38-year-old widow with eight children. She and the children continued to work the farm. At some point, possibly after Joseph's death, a porch running the length of the building was added to the back of the house. 

Porch at the rear of the Joseph Ferris House, accessed from digital.cincinnatilibrary.org

    Priscilla died in 1872, having outlived four of her children. Phebe, the final surviving Ferris child, died in 1896. The Ferris family cemetery is next to the Mariemont Community Church Memorial Chapel. There, you can find the gravesites of the Ferris brothers and their wives and children.

Ferris Family Cemetery


Joseph and Priscilla Ferris Gravestones

    Phebe’s will left most of her estate to her Jewett nephews. She left instructions, however, that the house and a large collection of books and family relics should be preserved as the Joseph Ferris Memorial Library. She established a trust for the library’s operating funds. The intention was that this would be a reference library, not a circulating library.

Joseph Ferris Memorial Library, accessed 6/13/2021 from http://www.mariemont.com/mariemont-preservation-foundation-takes-students-back-to-pioneer-days/ferris_library_fairfax_john_nolen_photo-2/

    A May 8, 1898 article in the Cincinnati Commercial Tribune described the Joseph Ferris house as follows:

About one mile south of Madisonville, between Plainville and Red Bank, in Columbia Township, there stands a fine old residence, surrounded by a well-kept garden with magnificent old trees crowding closely up to the stately building. It is a substantial structure of brick and stone, strong and solid enough to defy the gnawing teeth of time for another century. Broad steps lead to a column-flanked portico in front and a spacious covered verandah, extending the entire length of the house, on the opposite side. A wide hall leads straight through the building, from the heavy front door to the lighter rear entrance. A broad stairway leads to the hall of the upper floor, which is just as wide as the lower hall and also runs through the whole building. The rooms on both floors are arranged on both sides of the two corridors. . . . The rooms are high and large, the walls thick and well built, the woodwork is strong and solid, showing but little the effects of age.

     Following Phebe’s death, the house was occupied by caretakers, including the James and Clara Hunt family and later the family of Dr. Charles Metz, a physician, Ferris family friend, and trustee of the library. The Joseph Ferris Memorial Library was not successful and by 1930 the library’s trustees returned it to the Ferris heirs.

     The Ferris House fell into disrepair and stood empty for several years. The red brick was even painted white at one point. In 1935, the house and three surrounding acres were purchased by Rose Agerter and Marjorie Vance. Miss Agerter was dean of girls and assistant principal and Miss Vance a domestic sciences teacher at Withrow High School. The ladies had often driven by the old house and discussed what they would do to rehabilitate it if they were the owners.

     Misses Agerter and Vance worked to return the home to its former glory. The red brick was restored and the grounds improved. The ladies entertained at their home, hosting meetings, teas, and picnics for groups they were associated with, including the Hyde Park Literary Society and Monnett Club of Ohio Wesleyan University (Miss Vance) and the deans of girls of the Cincinnati area (Miss Agerter).

     The ladies sold the Joseph Ferris House and adjoining acreage in 1962 to Columbia-Wooster Building, Inc. Derek Hoxby, the vice-president of Columbia-Wooster, said that the house would be maintained as a museum, with office suites, a drive-in bank, stores, and possibly a supermarket planned for the surrounding area. Well, we got the bank and the office suites. I could have really gone for a nice grocery a couple of minutes away, though!

     The Eliphalet and Joseph Ferris houses were listed on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places in 1975. In the past 60 years, the Joseph Ferris House has housed various businesses, restaurants, retail establishments, and an art gallery. It is currently home to Old World Restorations and Vesper Alliance. I’m looking forward to seeing what the future holds for this lovely old building.

     If you are interested in the architecture of the Joseph Ferris House, the Library of Congress has a 1933 building survey with drawings of the house, floor plans, and architectural details at https://www.loc.gov/resource/hhh.oh0264.sheet?st=gallery.

     Be sure to read next month’s post to learn about the restaurants that occupied the Joseph Ferris House in the 1960’s.

Sources

“Symmes Purchase”, Ohio History Central, https://ohiohistorycentral.org/w/Symmes_Purchase, accessed May 3, 2021

“Map of Symmes Survey”, Hamilton County, Ohio Recorder’s Office, https://recordersoffice.hamilton-co.org/helpful_information/map_of_symmes_survey.pdf

“The Ferris Houses: Treasures in Mariemont and Fairfax”, Cincinnati Enquirer, December 6, 2018

“The Joseph Ferris House”, Mariemont Town Crier, November 2011

“Ferris Library”, Cincinnati Commercial Tribune, May 8, 1898

 “Cincinnati Landmarks: Wealth of History in Background of 126-Year-Old Ferris Home”, The Cincinnati Post, July 16, 1934

“Teachers Revive Romantic Atmosphere of Stately Old House on Wooster Pike”, The Cincinnati Post, December 25, 1935

“Shop Center to Preserve Ferris Home”, The Cincinnati Post, October 1, 1962


Updated November 11, 2024


Sunday, June 13, 2021

The Master Potter

 

    On a Sunday morning a few years ago, I read an article in the Cincinnati Enquirer about the Winold Reiss mosaic murals that graced Cincinnati’s Union Terminal, some of which were later moved to the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport. In reading about the murals, 16 mosaics that portrayed Cincinnati industry, I first encountered the name Ruben Earl Menzel. Earl, as he wished to be called, was featured in one of the murals. He worked at Rookwood Pottery and lived in Fairfax in 1931 at the time the photo the mural was based upon was taken. My interest was piqued.

    I learned that Earl and his family lived on Carlton for several decades. I asked my mom, who lived on Carlton a couple of blocks from him for a few years. She had never heard of him. I went to church and asked a couple of longtime former Fairfax residents, neither of whom had heard of him. Time for me to start digging to see what I could learn!

    Ruben Earl Menzel was born August 19, 1882 to John Jacob Menzel, Sr. and Albertina Flinker Menzel. At the time of his birth, his family lived in the Over the Rhine/West End area of Cincinnati, but later moved to the East End. Earl’s father was the master potter at Rookwood Pottery, which operated out of a converted schoolhouse on Eastern Avenue. Rookwood relocated to Mt. Adams in 1892 and the Menzel family moved there, no doubt to be closer to the Pottery. Earl left school after the eighth grade and apprenticed with his father at Rookwood. His mother, Albertina died when he was 12 years old. 

    On August 30, 1909, Earl married Agnes Smith of Cincinnati and they made their home in Mt. Adams with Agnes’ family. A little over a year later, the Menzels had their first child, Lucille. Unfortunately, Lucille sustained a brain injury at birth that resulted in paralysis of multiple parts of her body. In 1911, Earl’s father John passed away and Earl took his place as Rookwood Pottery's master potter. In 1916, the Menzels had a son, John.

    There was a building boom in Fairfax in the 1920s and the Menzel family moved to a home on Carlton Avenue in 1924. This sketch that appeared in the August 7, 1928 Cincinnati Post shows Earl throwing a pot at Rookwood Pottery:

 
   In early 1930, Earl and Agnes lived in the house at the corner of Carlton and Elder with their children Lucille and John and Agnes’ sister Katherine. Sadly, in May 1930 Lucille Menzel died at home from pneumonia at the age of 19. The funeral mass was held at St. Margaret of Cortona church.

    In 1931, artist Winold Reiss took a photograph of Earl at the wheel at Rookwood Pottery to use in the creation of the industry mosaic murals which were installed at Union Terminal in 1933. Below are the original photo and Earl as immortalized in mosaic: 


    Unlike many of the murals, Earl’s was never relocated to the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport. It remained at Union Terminal and can be found in the Machine Tool Gallery at  the Cincinnati History Museum.

    Not surprisingly, the Great Depression hit the Rookwood Pottery hard. For a time, Earl accepted no salary from the Pottery so his coworkers could keep their jobs. Despite his sacrifice, by 1932 Rookwood’s workforce was down to three, including Earl. He continued to work at the Pottery three days per week, sometimes decorating pottery to keep himself busy. By 1941, Rookwood Pottery was bankrupt, but continued production.

    The Menzels’ son John served in the Army Signal Corps during World War II. In an April 22, 1943 article in the Cincinnati Post, Earl explained that he was buying extra war bonds, in excess of 10 percent of his earnings, “to keep him and the other boys supplied with fighting equipment.”

    In addition to throwing (forming on a potter’s wheel) the pots, Earl was also able to design and decorate pieces. He chose to focus on throwing because it was the best paying job. A former coworker remembered Earl as a quiet man who was proud of his work. He liked to follow the Cincinnati Reds and listened to the Reds on the radio at his work station.

    In the mid-1950s, Earl produced some of his best-known pieces. In 1955, he made a pair of elephant bookends for President Dwight D. Eisenhower. Later that year, he made a tablet to be placed in the cornerstone of the new Procter & Gamble world headquarters in Downtown Cincinnati. The tablet was inscribed with the first line of the book of Genesis translated into 43 languages. In 1957, he created a plaque of Fountain Square based on a pen and ink drawing by artist Caroline Williams. This plaque was later reissued in 2008 for the rededication of Fountain Square. (I would love to have one of these, if anyone can find one and is feeling very generous!)

    Ruben Earl Menzel retired in 1959 when Rookwood Pottery ceased production. He worked at the Pottery for 63 years, longer than any other employee.

    Agnes Menzel died on June 4, 1965 and the funeral mass was conducted at St. Margaret of Cortona. Later in life, Earl went to live with his son John in Anderson Township and he sold his home on Carlton in 1970. He passed away at his son’s home on August 21, 1971 at the age of 89.

    My beloved babysitter, Frieda Greenstein, was a faithful member of St. Margaret and lived on Simpson, just a block from the Menzels. She also had some Rookwood pieces. Earl was a member of the Catholic Arts Association and, presumably, also of St. Margaret. I wonder if they knew each other. I wonder if Frieda’s pieces were thrown, decorated, or designed by Earl. I’ll probably never know.

    In doing historical or genealogical research, I often find myself wishing I could speak to my subjects. This is the case with Ruben Earl Menzel. He seemed like a humble man, yet obviously proud of his work. He experienced highs and lows in life. He lost his mother when he was only a boy and then lost his daughter before she reached the age of 20. He created pieces for a president and one of the largest corporations in the world. And he chose to live here in Fairfax.

Sources

Ancestry.com. Ohio, U.S., County Marriage Records, 1774-1993 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2016. Year Range: 1909

Ancestry.com. 1900 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004. Year: 1900; Census Place: Cincinnati Ward 4, Hamilton, Ohio; Page: 9; Enumeration District: 0036; FHL microfilm: 1241274

Ancestry.com. 1910 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006. Year: 1910; Census Place: Cincinnati Ward 4, Hamilton, Ohio; Roll: T624_1189; Page: 10B; Enumeration District: 0052; FHL microfilm: 1375202

Ancestry.com. 1930 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2002. Year: 1930; Census Place: Columbia, Hamilton, Ohio; Page: 11A; Enumeration District: 0327; FHL microfilm: 2341552

Cincinnati Enquirer, 5 June 1965, Page 16

Cincinnati Enquirer, 17 June 2013, Page B3

Cincinnati Enquirer, 29 December 2013, Page J9

Cincinnati Post (online), 7 Aug 1928 2 ‹https://infoweb-newsbank-com.research.cincinnatilibrary.org/apps/news/document-view?p=EANX-NB&docref=image/v2%3A13E376E28E0F8354%40EANX-NB-1675EEAAB4999771%402425466-16754F8D50F40D19%401-16754F8D50F40D19%40›

Cincinnati Post (online), 22 Apr 1943 3 ‹https://infoweb-newsbank-com.research.cincinnatilibrary.org/apps/news/document-view?p=EANX-NB&docref=image/v2%3A13E376E28E0F8354%40EANX-NB-167BB433A6C700D5%402430837-167A3D942043459D%402-167A3D942043459D%40›

Cincinnati Post (online), 14 Apr 1947 13 ‹https://infoweb-newsbank-com.research.cincinnatilibrary.org/apps/news/document-view?p=EANX-NB&docref=image/v2%3A13E376E28E0F8354%40EANX-NB-167DFB6F4929291E%402432290-167C58A24A07BC70%4012-167C58A24A07BC70%40›

Cincinnati Post (online), 21 Sep 1955 39 ‹https://infoweb-newsbank-com.research.cincinnatilibrary.org/apps/news/document-view?p=EANX-NB&docref=image/v2%3A13E376E28E0F8354%40EANX-NB-167F2C3E6373F4A4%402435372-167EB417B38BCC66%4038-167EB417B38BCC66%40›

Cincinnati Post (online), 21 Aug 1971 11 ‹https://infoweb-newsbank-com.research.cincinnatilibrary.org/apps/news/document-view?p=EANX-NB&docref=image/v2%3A13E376E28E0F8354%40EANX-NB-1691919F06ED381F%402441185-169182306B3B7AA9%4010-169182306B3B7AA9%40›

Cincinnati Post (online), 12 Jul 1985 12 ‹https://infoweb-newsbank-com.research.cincinnatilibrary.org/apps/news/document-view?p=EANX-NB&docref=image/v2%3A13E376E28E0F8354%40EANX-NB-16B350AAA3C3C7B4%402446259-16B305895D4A3819%4011-16B305895D4A3819%40›


Monday, May 31, 2021

The Police Shootout

 


    In preparing to write this blog, I downloaded hundreds of old newspaper articles. It was through this process that I discovered that a very familiar Fairfax site for me was the location of a police shootout in 1929. For the first three-plus years of their marriage, my parents rented the top floor apartment of a two-family house on Lonsdale. This was my and my sister’s first home. My mom remembers being told that someone had been shot in the house, but never heard the whole story. For reference, I’m writing about this area of Lonsdale:

 


    The accounts from the three newspapers I referenced vary somewhat, but I will attempt to piece together the story. The Sunday October 20, 1929 incident started at around 8:00 a.m. when Mariemont police received a report of a drunken disturbance in the vicinity of Lonsdale and Hawthorne in Fairfax. As you know from the previous posts, this was over 25 years before Fairfax became a village and had its own police department. My mom heard (she doesn’t remember from whom) that the disturbance began on the corner where the small salon (and former barber shop) stands. Mariemont patrolman John Bierman responded and found Wesley Williams, John Lawson, and a third man named McDonald making a disturbance. Neighbors warned Bierman that the men were armed, so he returned to Mariemont for assistance.

    Bierman returned to the scene with Lieutenant William Strieder and as the police car pulled up, the three men threw away two bottles of moonshine (this was the Prohibition era). The men resisted arrest. Williams, who was a constable in the Fairfax subdivision for several years, pulled his revolver, but the officers disarmed him. Williams then drew a knife and was again disarmed. Lawson and McDonald stormed the officers and Williams barricaded himself in his home on Lonsdale.

    The officers again returned to Mariemont to get shotguns and ammunition. Mariemont Chief Louis Strieder (Lieutenant Strieder’s father) returned to Fairfax with them. For the next hour and a half, gunfire was exchanged between the police and Williams, who reportedly ran from room to room, window to window, taunting and taking shots at the police. Patrolman Bierman was the first person shot, wounded in the face and arms.

    Chief Strieder, who was credited with removing Bierman from the line of fire, was also shot near his right eye and arm. According to his son’s account, the chief continued to engage with Williams, even though his vision was obstructed by blood from the wound near his eye.

    In the meantime, Cincinnati Police were called to the scene. Motorcycle Patrolman Albert Shane went to the rear of the house and exchanged fire with Williams. Williams called from the back door, “Come in and get me.” Williams went to fire on Shane when Shane shot Williams, causing him to stagger back into his house, closing the door as he went.

    A few minutes later, Mrs. Eva Williams, Wesley’s wife, called for the police to enter because her husband had been shot. Mrs. Williams and her younger brother hid in the home throughout the gun battle. The Hamilton County Sheriff’s Department had also arrived at the scene. Police ultimately recovered two shotguns, a revolver, ammunition, and 30 bottles of homebrew.

    During the siege, neighbors hid in their homes to avoid being hit by stray bullets. Even so, a newspaper report stated that a couple of hundred people showed up to watch the shootout from a safe distance. (In my experience, Fairfax always has a strong turnout for tragedies and catastrophes.)

    Among those hunkering down were Wesley Williams’ upstairs neighbors, the Hollidays. According to the Cincinnati Post, “. . . Emmett D. Kirgan, detective chief [of the Cincinnati Police], considered having an airplane bomb the home until he learned another family was inside the house.” Seriously? Where do you get a bomb on short notice? Do you just toss the bomb out of an airplane window or did the Cincinnati police have a bomber on standby? Would it have been accurate enough to only take out that one house and not the neighboring homes and the spectators watching “from a safe distance?” But I digress.

    Wesley Williams was transported to General Hospital, where he died two days later. Patrolman Bierman was hospitalized at Jewish Hospital and recovered. Chief Strieder recuperated at home.

    John Lawson was later taken into custody without incident at his home on Carlton. On January 2, 1930, Lawson pleaded guilty to resisting arrest. As far as I can tell from newspaper accounts, the third man “McDonald” was never apprehended or further identified.

 

Sources

October 21, 1929, page 1, Cincinnati Commercial Tribune Retrieved from https://newspaperarchive.com/cincinnati-commercial-tribune-oct-21-1929-p-1/

January 3, 1930, page 3, Cincinnati Commercial Tribune Retrieved from Cincinnati Commercial Tribune, Retrieved from https://newspaperarchive.com/cincinnati-commercial-tribune-jan-03-1930-p-3/

October 21, 1929 (page 1 of 28). (1929, Oct 21). Cincinnati Enquirer (1923-2009) Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.research.cincinnatilibrary.org/historical-newspapers/october-21-1929-page-1-28/docview/1883065795/se-2?accountid=39387

January 3, 1930 (page 12 of 22). (1930, Jan 03). Cincinnati Enquirer (1923-2009) Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.research.cincinnatilibrary.org/historical-newspapers/january-3-1930-page-12-22/docview/1881580285/se-2?accountid=39387

October 21, 1929, page 1, Cincinnati Post Retrieved from NewsBank: America's Historical Newspapers: https://infoweb-newsbank-com.research.cincinnatilibrary.org/apps/news/document-view?p=EANX-NB&docref=image/v2%3A13E376E28E0F8354%40EANX-NB-1677071361E61D6C%402425906-167529256F037E2D%400-167529256F037E2D%40.

October 22, 1929, page 13, Cincinnati Post Retrieved from NewsBank: America's Historical Newspapers: https://infoweb-newsbank-com.research.cincinnatilibrary.org/apps/news/document-view?p=EANX-NB&docref=image/v2%3A13E376E28E0F8354%40EANX-NB-16770713DEF2E18E%402425907-1675292EF9E0843F%4012-1675292EF9E0843F%40.